Why Does Nature Hate The Color Blue?
Nature is full of
The Colors of Nature
Of all the wavelengths of light that make up the electromagnetic spectrum, humans can only ‘see’ a small range of it. Yet, this so-called visible spectrum is enough to give us a remarkably vibrant perspective of reality! The machinery in our eyes and brain allows us to witness a continuum of color that makes the world around us just that much more interesting.
Despite the fact that blue is everyone’s favorite color, it is extremely rare to come across it in nature. Think about it, when was the last time you saw a blue dog? A blue squirrel? Most animals prefer a shade of brown or red for their coat or skin. Even when animals utilize coloration to stand out instead of for camouflage, the color blue is rarely seen.
And out of the few animals that have blue skin/feathers/scales, even fewer are ‘true’ blues. In fact, as you’ll see, many of these animals possess intricate surfaces that make them seem blue, but actually contain no blue pigmentation at all!
The Blue Morpho Butterfly
Arguably the most colorfully diverse group of animals, butterflies possess a huge variety of colors in the most brilliant of hues. This trait is especially apparent in blue morpho butterflies, with wings of iridescent blue. This bright blue is visible at extremely long distances, and can easily be picked up by low-flying aircraft.
But are they the result of blue pigmentation? The answer is no. Scientists have found that – rather than pigments – tiny structures on their wings are responsible for its color. These microscopic scales reflect up to 75% of blue light reaching them, scattering them at large angles1.
The scales on Morpho butterflies’ wings scatter blue light waves in phase, resulting in constructive interference. Other colors of light that the scales reflect are out of phase, which results in destructive interference between parallel waves. At the physical level, this is the cause of the brilliant blue hue of these butterflies.
Birds that appear blue, such as bluebirds (duh), make use of tiny pockets of air in their feathers to scatter light. Furthermore, these birds often have feathers that absorb other non-blue wavelengths of light, causing a more pronounced and brilliant blue. Fish have the advantage of scales, which are good surfaces to produce iridescent colors. These reflective ‘tricks’ to produce blue are rather common in the natural world.
In fact, the lack of blue pigmentation isn’t restricted to just animal and plants. Think about the blue of the sky, the sea, and even in your eyes – other eye colors except for blue actually do contain pigmentation. They all rely on various forms of light scattering to achieve their blue.
But once in a blue moon, we do find a living organism in possession of this pigment. A rare example of this is the mandarin fish, with large swatches of blue skin. Microscopy revealed the presence of chromatophores (light-reflecting cells) on its skin containing blue pigmentation2.
Why is Natural Blue So Rare?
True blue or not, the color blue is nevertheless a rare natural occurrence. But why? Colors play a huge role in nature; animals and plants use colors to attract mates, to scare off predators, to distinguish between individuals of a species. By making an individual stand out, a rare color should confer an evolutionary advantage. Therefore there must be other factors in play, preventing the proliferation of blue.
One theory is that it is down to chance that blue isn’t in the ‘natural pool’ of colors. After all, most pigmentation in animals comes from their food. Flamingos are born grey and turn pink after consuming their signature diet of brine shrimp. In fact, eating too many carrots and pumpkins (containing beta-carotene, a natural dye) will turn our own skin a shade of orange! Hence the rarity of blue pigmentation is simply due to
But can this really explain the absence of blue? Another theory suggests that the lack of blue comes down to the costs if using this particular color. Not the cost in terms of money, but rather the energy cost. Energy is a valuable resource in nature, where maximizing efficiency and effective conservation can be the difference between survival and death.
The Chemistry of Blue
From a chemical point of view, emission of visible light is the result of fluorescence. The process of fluorescence involves an excited electron coming back down to its ground state. This releases energy in the form of a photon, or light, of a particular wavelength.
Each color-producing molecule (also known as a dye) has a specific energy at which it releases its excitement. As it stands, blue/violet has a shorter wavelength, and hence higher energy, than other colors. This means that for a molecule to fluoresce a nice blue color, it must undergo a higher energy transition!
What does this tell us about the structures of dyes? For a compound to emit blue light, it must undergo a higher energy transition to do so. This means that the structure of the dye must also be of higher energy.
What this means is, from an evolutionary perspective, having a bunch of high energy structures that can emit blue light isn’t a particularly appealing prospect! These structures will require more energy to maintain and be more reactive than other lower energy, higher wavelength dyes, such as orange or brown. And when animals and plants do choose to present the color blue, they prefer using light scattering physics instead!
- Vukusic, P., Sambles, J. R., Lawrence, C. R., & Wootton, R. J. (1999). Quantified interference and diffraction in single Morpho butterfly scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1427), 1403-1411.
- Goda, M., & Fujii, R. (1995). Blue Chromatophores in Two Species of Callionymid Fish. Zoological Science, 12(6), 811-814.